Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abzan Roots | bryzem | 4-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Roots , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Roots , Gruul Delirium , Jund Delirium , Jund Roots , Jund Tokens , Selesnya Landfall , Simic Merfolks
Meta Performance Analysis
Cache Grab ranks #175 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 56%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 57.8%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Cache Grab is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.6%. Cache Grab has a win rate of 57.1%, making it 20.2% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 17 | 71.5% | 7 |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 5 | 65.4% | 1 |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 8 | 59.1% | 2 |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 60 | 55.5% | 17 |
| Monastery Mentor | Creature — Human Monk | 48 | 54.4% | 13 |
| The Stone Brain | Legendary Artifact | 6 | 54.1% | 2 |
| Ketramose, the New Dawn | Legendary Creature — God | 8 | 53.8% | 3 |
| Stoic Sphinx | Creature — Sphinx | 16 | 53.3% | 2 |
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 6 | 52.2% | 2 |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 28 | 50.6% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Cache Grab than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simic Terror | 301 | 98.0% | 43.3% |
| Golgari Roots | 22 | 88.0% | 28.1% |
| Abzan Roots | 17 | 85.0% | 43.3% |
| Unknown Archetype | 11 | 3.5% | 46.4% |
| Gruul Delirium | 8 | 5.3% | 31.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.